A retired Quebec judge who spent years behind bars and was facing a second murder trial in his wife’s 2009 shooting death pleaded guilty to manslaughter, putting an end to a nearly 15-year legal battle.
Jacques Delisle appeared at the Quebec City courthouse Thursday to admit to one count of manslaughter. He walked in slowly, wearing a navy suit and a mask.
Delisle’s lawyer told the courtroom his client did not shoot his wife Marie Nicole Rainville but he caused her death by leaving a loaded gun next to her at her request. Delisle was painted as a loving husband to an ailing wife, but his lawyer acknowledged he had taken a more active role in her death by suicide than previously admitted.
Crown prosecutor François Godin supported the manslaughter plea, but said he did not agree with the defence’s version of events. He sentenced Delisle to one day, and the former magistrate could be heard saying “you’re not serious” as he was cuffed and escorted out out of the courtroom.
Delisle, 88, is believed to be the first Canadian judge to ever stand trial for murder. He was convicted in 2012 of fatally shooting Rainville and was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years.
Breaking news from Canada and around the world
sent to your email, as it happens.
Breaking news from Canada and around the world
sent to your email, as it happens.
The former Quebec Court of Appeal judge maintained his innocence for years, saying Rainville took her own life while the Crown argued Delisle killed her.
A major part of the case revolved around the angle of entry of the bullet, which could confirm or infer a suicide. Questions surrounding the reliability of this forensic evidence led to a new trial being ordered in 2021.
Delisle’s initial appeal was dismissed in 2013, and the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear his case. He spent nine years in prison.
But Delisle was freed in 2021 when David Lametti, the federal justice minister at the time, ordered a new trial after reviewing evidence that was not previously before the courts and concluded a miscarriage of justice had likely occurred.
In April 2022, Delisle’s lawyers then argued successfully that a retrial would be impossible because of the errors in the pathology report and unreasonable delays. But the Court of Appeal later reversed the Superior Court judge’s decision to grant a stay and paved the way for a new trial.
The Supreme Court of Canada was expected to decide on Thursday whether it would hear Delisle’s appeal of that last decision.
— with files from Global’s Franca Mignacca and The Canadian Press
© 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.